Help
Not signed in (Sign In)
-
Latest Discussions
- British 1971 1/2 New Penny - off-metal pattern coin in aluminium!
- (14 hours ago)
- This is a crazy proposal.
- (1 day ago)
- Looking for illustration of "Retrograde 1"
- (2 days ago)
- 2009 silver penny
- (6 days ago)
- Auction catalogues for bronze halfpenny collections
- (Aug 28th 2010)
- 1869 halfpenny
- (Aug 21st 2010)
- 1874 H R over R farthing, recent find
- (Aug 17th 2010)
- New decimal 2010 coins
- (Aug 6th 2010)
- www.worldnumismaticphotogallery.net is coming soon!
- (Aug 6th 2010)
- New Coin Books
- (Jun 30th 2010)
Categories
Vanilla 1.1.8 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
Welcome Guest!
Want to take part in these discussions? If you have an account, sign in now.
If you don't have an account, apply for one now.
Want to take part in these discussions? If you have an account, sign in now.
If you don't have an account, apply for one now.
-
- CommentAuthorBARRY
- CommentTimeNov 3rd 2009
I was intrigued on a particular aspect of dealer openness; one which I find laudable but just cannot understand. Why do some dealers, when selling higher value coins, let you know exactly where they acquired the coin (eg, Spink) and, thus, enable you to find out exactly how much they paid for it. I think it's great, but it does sort of put me off buying the coin. -
- CommentAuthorScottO
- CommentTimeNov 3rd 2009
authenticity i guess, high value coins, if you wanted one, you would want to know if it is indeed genuine -
- CommentAuthorPortman
- CommentTimeNov 4th 2009
Yes, authenticity and provenance are the reasons. If it was bought in a Spink auction for example, since they starting archiving their auctions on line, you should be able to find a picture and details of the coin to check it is the same one. That also means that Spink's experts have verified the authenticity, although even they can occasionally make mistakes in indentification of varieties. Provenance is importance for very rare coins, where there are only a few examples known, and it can be essential to trace the auction history of a particular piece. Disclosing the price the coin was previously traded at may only be a secondary consideration. If prices have gone up since then, buyers know they have to pay more to get desirable pieces. Anyway this openness is certainly to be commended. On the other side of the fence there are a lot of shady characters about who don't want to disclose auction provenance because they are trying to make a quick buck by upping the grade and/or deliberately misidentifying a piece they have just acquired at auction where it was correctly graded and identified. Many of them are to be found on Ebay masquerading as bona fide dealers. -
- CommentAuthorBARRY
- CommentTimeNov 5th 2009
Thanks ScottO and thanks Portman.
regarding the eBay 'dealers' epidemic I do notice that many of them manage to acquire trade body recognition.
It's good to have these bodies as watchdogs but it seems to me they may be dropiing their standards a little.
Any thoughts on that? -
- CommentAuthorPortman
- CommentTimeNov 5th 2009 edited
Barry, a couple of years back I was interested in a Q Anne guinea on a respectable auctioneers' site. I had corresponded with the auctioneer to get more information but didn't in the end bid on it. Soon afterwards I spotted the same coin being offered on Ebay by some one who claimed to be a dealer with trade body recognition both in the UK and the US. It was an elephant and castle variety but the castle was weakly struck and rather close to the truncation, as pointed out in the auctioneer's description. The dealer had touched up the photograph a bit and described it as "a very rare and unclassified elephant only variety". In fact there are no elephant only varieties listed in the entire Q Anne gold series and the likelihood of one turning up seems virtually nil. In addition to the misidentification, he bumped the piece up two whole grades from the auctioneer's description and his enhanced photograph made this look credible. I never checked to see whether the dealer was really accredited or a complete phoney. His account was shut down soon afterwards due to complaints but he might easily have set up another.
There are also some accredited UK dealers who regularly hype up varieties of sovereigns as being much rarer than they really are on Ebay e.g. making out that closed or open 2 George III 1820 sovereigns are very rare and they hardly ever see them come up etc. Presumably they hope to catch out new collectors who jumped into the sovereign craze when the price of gold shot up. These cases are more grey area as they are not actually guilty of misidentification. They can always argue that the rarity was only their personal perception and they didn't set the selling price themselves but, whatever they say, they are still unethical. Ebay is great in many ways but makes it really hard for the watchdogs to do their jobs. It is probably OK for non-rare pieces where there is less incentive to cheat. It's also great for general consumer items.
While I'm at it, I once saw a so called accredited dealer offering a rare piece on Ebay UK that I also found on a US dealer's fixed price website. When the bid went over the fixed price, I checked with the US dealer who said he still had the piece in stock, so I ordered it. But a few days later he said there had been a mistake and it had already been sold before he offered to me. I then noticed that it had just been sold on Ebay by the second dealer for significantly more than the US dealer's fixed price. The dealer on Ebay was apparently auctioning coins that he didn't own or have on consignment and the US dealer was obviously lying to me too. Perhaps they were in fact the same person operating under different identities. -
- CommentAuthorBARRY
- CommentTimeNov 5th 2009
Thanks once again my friend for an excellent reply.
Barry -
- CommentAuthorBC Numismatics
- CommentTimeNov 5th 2009
FleaBay = Scammers' Paradise!
Caveat Emptor - Buyer Beware!
Aidan.
1 to 7 of 7